نتونستم تو گوگل نوت دسته بندی کنم، دلمم نیومد پاکش کنم و در اصل برای این مجبور بودم تایپ کنم که دستم تو آتله.
1-Has fingerprinting remained reliable after all?
2-What aspects does fingerprint lack in?
3-How should this method be treated according to Simon Cole's opinion?
4-Who did notice that everybody's fingerprints are kinda unique?
5-Why did the level of fingerprints' reliablity has lowered?
6-What instrument is required for making fingerprints visible?
7-Why is DNA fingerprinting more secure than the former?
8-Do you think Mr. Mitchell was really guilty or an innocent of fingerprinting's flaws?
9-Why were laboratories' second turn-outs different comparing to the first time?
10-What does justify the act of investing 500.000$ on fingerprints' reliablity researches?
Ad 2, Ms. Kataal. Unit 4
دریای تلخ...
برچسب : نویسنده : maryamtsa بازدید : 36